Tuesday, May 17
creme de la creme
- gluten-free girl
- dooce
- ohdeedoh
- maeda's laws of simplicity
- live vicariously thru ted
- al's attic
- chakst*r
- little puppy blog
delicioso
- my flickr sets
- my facebook identiy
- engadget
- shockwave.com
- map my run . com
- pace calculator
- bread & other things (old)
last night's dinner
- end of an era
- naw'lins
- a room with a view
- holy moly!
- moooo-vies
- poooo-oo-oof!
- oui!
- home run!
- holy eye-sores
- feather that oar
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]


3 Comments:
Now, there's an issue I've never given ten seconds' thought to. What is the problem with "comic sans?"
Seriously!?
I would go into a rant here, but for sake of brevity, lets call upon the well-crafted prose of that site:
"The design of the typeface is, in itself, its voice. Often this voice speaks louder than the text itself.
Thus when designing a "Do Not Enter" sign, the use of a heavy-stroked, attention-commanding font such as Impact or Arial Black is appropriate. Typesetting such a message in Comic Sans would be ludicrous.
Though this is sort of misuse is frequent, it is unjustified. Clearly, Comic Sans as a voice conveys silliness, childish naivete, irreverence, and is far too casual for such a purpose.
It is analogous to showing up for a black tie event in a clown costume."
- bancomicsans.com
I agree. That font bugs me.
I also don't like serifed fonts. Am I the only one who thinks that looks bad?
Post a Comment
<< Home